Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Bell Mobility/Motorola awarded emergency service contract in Manitoba Canada.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 25, 2012
    Posts
    122
    Thanks
    500
    Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
    Country: Canada

    Default Bell Mobility/Motorola awarded emergency service contract in Manitoba Canada.

    The Manitoba government awarded Bell Mobility Inc the contract for a new P25 radio system that will be Motorola built. I read a few months back that that the tender must be for a "public safety band only", so it will be a 700 Mhz system. Sorry I don't have a better link, could not find another.

    https://www.winnipegfreepress.com/lo...490397101.html


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 21, 2011
    Posts
    4,545
    Thanks
    3,879
    Thanked 6,740 Times in 1,930 Posts
    Country: Canada

    Default

    And the same fucktarded fools at the VEMA (Vehicle Equipment Maintenance Authority/Agency) will be programming/maintaining the radios. So clueless. The MCS2000s in the provincial ambulances haven't been programmed/firmware updated/PM checked since 1998-2001.

    Every single one of them should be in jail for putting the lives' of citizens at risk. In January, I reported a Quik-Call II pager that was 4 kHz off frequency and severely under-deviated. The EMS agency wasn't receiving pages. The VEMA idiots didn't care whatsoever; they only wanted to know who to bill.

    The EMS agency had not received a dispatch for someone pinned under a tractor-trailer, because of the faulty pager. They had a delayed response time. This is why I reported it. The crash turned out to be a fatality (instant death), but this joke of a radio shop (VEMA) didn't understand the seriousness of the situation.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manit...rash-1.4478624

    Things in Manitoba really need to change before they implement this new system, of which no competent persons will be running or responsible for reliability, maintenance, installations, optimizing configurations, proper training, accessory selection/maintenance, etc. All the fucktards they have there now treat the current system as if it's some kind of rental system used by retarded snow plow operators or something.

    Manitoba is the biggest shithole in Canada with zero accountability. Why else would they still be running a SmartZone 4.1 system, more than a decade after Moto stopped selling parts for it? And they're currently sourcing replacement parts on eBay!

    Glad I left that crap hole. There's no hope. It'll always be that way.

  3. The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Mars For This Useful Post:

    BobbyBoucher (Aug 10, 2018),box (Aug 13, 2018),C.Cheesman (Aug 11, 2018),com501 (Aug 09, 2018),mshelby (Aug 12, 2018),OPS (Aug 15, 2018),SPECIAL_EYE (Aug 10, 2018),SwissMoto (Aug 10, 2018),Viper1-6 (Aug 09, 2018)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 04, 2012
    Location
    True North Strong and Free
    Posts
    286
    Thanks
    1,850
    Thanked 518 Times in 223 Posts
    Country: Albania

    Default

    https://news.gov.mb.ca/news/index.ht...ted=2018-08-08[


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to Viper1-6 For This Useful Post:

    SPECIAL_EYE (Aug 10, 2018)

  6. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 11, 2012
    Location
    HTX
    Posts
    1,081
    Thanks
    987
    Thanked 1,488 Times in 646 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default

    Public/private partnerships for infrastructure should be outlawed. They're just cash grabs for the business off the backs of the taxpayers.
    "The Girl Scouts found several hungry REACT members at the finish line..."

  7. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to motorola_otaku For This Useful Post:

    box (Aug 13, 2018),jmfirefighter20 (Aug 11, 2018),Mars (Aug 10, 2018),MTS2000DES (Aug 10, 2018),p47r4ck (Aug 10, 2018),radio (Aug 11, 2018),SPECIAL_EYE (Aug 10, 2018)

  8. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 04, 2012
    Posts
    1,874
    Thanks
    180
    Thanked 668 Times in 303 Posts

    Default

    Expect the system to be patterned after the Ontario VHF Fleetnet system.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to Notarola For This Useful Post:

    C.Cheesman (Aug 11, 2018)

  10. #6
    Join Date
    May 14, 2012
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 199 Times in 93 Posts
    Country: Canada

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Notarola View Post
    Expect the system to be patterned after the Ontario VHF Fleetnet system.
    God help Manitoba.

  11. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to CQDX For This Useful Post:

    C.Cheesman (Aug 11, 2018),Mars (Aug 11, 2018),p25smartzone (Aug 11, 2018)

  12. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 17, 2013
    Location
    NH
    Posts
    61
    Thanks
    121
    Thanked 123 Times in 52 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by motorola_otaku View Post
    Public/private partnerships for infrastructure should be outlawed. They're just cash grabs for the business off the backs of the taxpayers.
    Just like FirstNet!

  13. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to jmfirefighter20 For This Useful Post:

    Mars (Aug 11, 2018),motorola_otaku (Aug 13, 2018),MTS2000DES (Aug 12, 2018)

  14. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 25, 2012
    Posts
    122
    Thanks
    500
    Thanked 39 Times in 24 Posts
    Country: Canada

    Default

    CODX the times I have had the opportunity to listen to the Ontario VHF Fleetnet it seemed to work OK, but i live in Manitoba. Do they have trouble with the system in Ontario or are you taliking more about Ma Bell?

    Also that system is mixed analog digital so it's not true P25. One good thing for us it being M is they don't give encryption away for free so maybe there is a chance I can still listen to something on the new system?

    Quote Originally Posted by CQDX View Post
    God help Manitoba.

  15. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 10, 2013
    Location
    eastern side of au
    Posts
    256
    Thanks
    107
    Thanked 170 Times in 95 Posts
    Country: Australia

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SPECIAL_EYE View Post
    One good thing for us it being M is they don't give encryption away for free so maybe there is a chance I can still listen to something on the new system?
    They need something to flog to the customer at a very healthy markup (99% plus profit) to make up for undocumented cost overruns which the vendors hold the govt accountable for.

    It is just another govt engagement using the PPP method, it/they will rip the eyes out of the govt as the corporates know best!
    I do not believe in political correctness BS leftest tripe
    Suck it up, HTFU and make the place great again! Work never killed anyone who did it safely

  16. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to techman For This Useful Post:

    Mars (Aug 12, 2018),SPECIAL_EYE (Aug 14, 2018)

  17. #10
    Join Date
    May 14, 2012
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 199 Times in 93 Posts
    Country: Canada

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SPECIAL_EYE View Post
    Do they have trouble with the system in Ontario or are you taliking more about Ma Bell?
    Moreso MaBell.

    That said, the system is old and likely in need of upgrading quite soon. I'm not aware of any mission-critical failures but I do hear grumbling from analog users about audio quality not being what it used to be. Before Bell ran the Provincial networks, PM checks were done annually on all the equipment. Now? I'd be surprised if some radio have even been looked at since their initial installation.

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CQDX For This Useful Post:

    Mars (Aug 12, 2018),SPECIAL_EYE (Aug 14, 2018)

  19. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 11, 2013
    Location
    Northern Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    16
    Thanks
    252
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    Country: Canada

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CQDX View Post
    Moreso MaBell.

    That said, the system is old and likely in need of upgrading quite soon. I'm not aware of any mission-critical failures but I do hear grumbling from analog users about audio quality not being what it used to be. Before Bell ran the Provincial networks, PM checks were done annually on all the equipment. Now? I'd be surprised if some radio have even been looked at since their initial installation.
    I have couple buddy's who work for bell mobility radio and they do quite a bit of regular pm's on the tower sites. The ambulance just recently switched from mcs2000's with uhf VR's to apx6500 with 700 VR's. As far as I know on the p25 side of it is using astro spectra or xtl5000

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to C.Cheesman For This Useful Post:

    SPECIAL_EYE (Aug 14, 2018)

  21. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 04, 2012
    Posts
    1,874
    Thanks
    180
    Thanked 668 Times in 303 Posts

    Default

    Cheeseman is correct. My research shows the analog side is mostly mcs2000 with some newer APx being used to replace the NLA 2000s The p25 side is a mix of astro spectras with W series heads. The bulk of the fleet is is XTL5000 with the majority using W series heads. There are some newer installs using O5 heads and some APX as well since the XTLs are not available anymore. All the major users have analog VRS.

    The general system layout is P25 non encrypted for LE and analog for EMS. Reports indicate an upgrade of sometype is in the works. My speculation would be the addition of hardware encryption to the P25 radios or a upgrade to APX with encryption for LE and the existing P25 equipment being used to convert EMS to P25. The VRS would also be upgraded to DVRS. The system is non simulcast and is divided into 4 main zones. Each zone has multiple sites with users roaming from site to site as the transverse the coverage areas.

    For Manitoba I can see the analog for non LE format being used again, Its cheaper and there may be possible issues around localities using TRBO/DMR. LE should be digital ENC. The system will not be a simulcast system although they may create a few simulcast sites within the system .

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Notarola For This Useful Post:

    SPECIAL_EYE (Aug 14, 2018)

  23. #13
    Join Date
    Nov 04, 2012
    Location
    True North Strong and Free
    Posts
    286
    Thanks
    1,850
    Thanked 518 Times in 223 Posts
    Country: Albania

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Notarola View Post
    For Manitoba I can see the analog for non LE format being used again, Its cheaper and there may be possible issues around localities using TRBO/DMR. LE should be digital ENC. The system will not be a simulcast system although they may create a few simulcast sites within the system .
    But if they are going to a 7.xx Astro25 system would analogue not be off the table. Anybody that has moved away from type 2/EDACS/everything else has done fully digital.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  24. The Following User Says Thank You to Viper1-6 For This Useful Post:

    SPECIAL_EYE (Aug 14, 2018)

  25. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 04, 2012
    Posts
    1,874
    Thanks
    180
    Thanked 668 Times in 303 Posts

    Default

    I am not in the planning group for the proposed system and have no connection with it. All I can do is comment on industry rumors and chit chat.

    From what I have heard there is concern about fire department inter-op as well as hoped for integration of other services like electricity and enviormental operations. Many of these services are still analog or have transitioned to public sector style systems like TRBO. The wish list is for as many services to be transitioned to the system as possible to spread out the cost of the infrastructure. The technical people are aware that if the new system is strictly P25 or P25 phase II there is going to be issues. Someway needs to be built into the system for analog operation if for no other reason than to interface with existing local networks or systems.

    The system is still in the very early planning stages but Bell mobility is aware of some of the short comings in the Ontario system and seems to have some plans to try and avoid them in the new proposed system. One thing I have heard is that large scale users will be included in the pre planning stage to see what their usage requirements are.

    Most of these concerns would go away if APX supported TRBO as well as P25 but Moto seems to have dug their heels in and will not even consider TRBO mode for APX. If some other manufacturuer were to make a TRBO/DMR and P25 unit they would be a slamdunk to supply the hardware. Of course there is no P25/P25 Phase II/DMR/TRBO trunking system in existence either but with 380 million + to play with Im sure something might be possible.

  26. The Following User Says Thank You to Notarola For This Useful Post:

    Viper1-6 (Aug 12, 2018)

  27. #15
    Join Date
    May 04, 2013
    Posts
    152
    Thanks
    971
    Thanked 108 Times in 53 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Notarola View Post
    ...If some other manufacturuer were to make a TRBO/DMR and P25 unit they would be a slamdunk to supply the hardware...
    Well, there is this : http://comms.kenwood.com/special/nx_5000

    You can only pick 2 of 3 availible protocols. But, it exists!

  28. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to p47r4ck For This Useful Post:

    Mars (Aug 12, 2018),Notarola (Aug 12, 2018),Viper1-6 (Aug 12, 2018)

  29. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 09, 2012
    Location
    do20
    Posts
    80
    Thanks
    94
    Thanked 107 Times in 41 Posts
    Country: Canada

    Default

    I'm using those NX radios here, as I'm sure you've seen me say before, but only in P25 mode exclusively - the only DMR or NXDN in my area for public safety use (and these radios are strictly being used for public safety) are in VHF and UHF bands - the NX radios are 7/8.

    In my and my crews' experience, the radios operate very well on P25 - with one exception: If you manage to get into a "queued" state (i.e. you try to transmit when someone else is talking), the radio will not go out of queued state unless you either change channel or power-cycle. But, from what I've heard, that may have more to do with the particular P25 system than the radios themselves (I have heard other people suggest that Harris is doing something somewhat unexpected with the response to a queued condition, despite the fact the system is required to be "vendor agnostic" i.e. observing the plain P25 standard with no proprietary bells and/or whistles).

  30. #17
    Join Date
    Feb 04, 2012
    Posts
    1,874
    Thanks
    180
    Thanked 668 Times in 303 Posts

    Default

    I will investigate the NX5000. the queued state may also be firmware based with the radio not resetting a flag in the OSW buffer or what ever it uses to remember its last TX state (awaiting response from controler??)

    I dont want to hijack the thread about possible configurations but this might make an interesting topic of its own.

  31. #18
    Join Date
    May 14, 2012
    Posts
    326
    Thanks
    78
    Thanked 199 Times in 93 Posts
    Country: Canada

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Notarola View Post
    From what I have heard there is concern about fire department inter-op as well as hoped for integration of other services like electricity and enviormental operations. Many of these services are still analog or have transitioned to public sector style systems like TRBO. The wish list is for as many services to be transitioned to the system as possible to spread out the cost of the infrastructure. The technical people are aware that if the new system is strictly P25 or P25 phase II there is going to be issues. Someway needs to be built into the system for analog operation if for no other reason than to interface with existing local networks or systems.
    I remember the "promise" of true interop when Fleetnet first went live, until potential users saw the price tag. At the time, they were asking something like $50/month/radio for analog service, for a municipal fire department. Not sure if that has changed, but I wouldn't be surprised.

    The most recent news I heard from a source was that the system would be mixed VHF/700 (and the fact that they're starting to roll out APX8500s should be indication of that, as well as 700MHz DVRSs up in Zone 4), fully encrypted for all LE and EMS users with MTO having an option to encrypt. Of course, time will tell. Buck-A-Beer has higher priority right now.

  32. #19
    Join Date
    Feb 04, 2012
    Posts
    1,874
    Thanks
    180
    Thanked 668 Times in 303 Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CQDX View Post
    Buck-A-Beer has higher priority right now.
    And so it should LOL.

    I believe with fleetnet testing is being done in zone 4 as you say. The slow potential rollout is because the system admins are waiting for long term commitments from MOH and OPP before inverting $$ into new infrastructure and hardware.