Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Freedom vs Aeroflex 8800SX

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 27, 2019
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default Freedom vs Aeroflex 8800SX

    Have both in my office right now for eval. Curious what others have to say about both these boxes independent of my views. P25 phase 1&2, apx autoalign.


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 20, 2019
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    36
    Thanks
    69
    Thanked 60 Times in 21 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default

    We are issued the 8800SX's and they are really nice. We have autoaligned everything from XPR to APX with no issues. We also use it on a P1 P25 system we manage for a public safety agency and no problems to date with it. The biggest issue I have with the 8800 is the bootup time. It takes forever for it to boot up.
    "Scanner hobbyists have conjured up the idea that a new, unscannable technology is not interoperable"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 23, 2013
    Location
    DO24
    Posts
    48
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 51 Times in 28 Posts
    Country: Canada

    Default

    I'm no more impressed with the R8000/R8100 boot up time since it is literally booting an embedded Windows PC as well. Even R&S CMU and CMW series are running Windows now, so I guess the days of quick booting service monitors are bygone...

    At least Freedom finally figured out how to put the battery pack INSIDE the chassis with the R8100 which was sorely missing and not well integrated on the R8000. But there still doesn't seem to be a setting for "remember last measurement settings" without having to store it to a profile every time. Still a reason why I reach for a COM120 when I don't need digital modes or automation...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 27, 2019
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default

    So I've done comparative boot time testing, Freedom 1:31 and Aeroflex 3:16...yes a major difference.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jun 09, 2019
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default Get the 8800

    I tested both, and ultimately recomended the 8800sx for my employer. We were mostly interested in TRBO auto align, and the Freedom unit fell on it's face in that regard. It required many more steps with much more operator involvement, and at the time required the use of the Motorola audio test box. The 8800 was much more i̶d̶i̶o̶t̶ new technician and more importantly, long time employee with poor computer skills proof, and could easily skip tests you didn't want. The Freedom service monitor also had terrible UI lag under certain conditions. This was a year and a half ago so I might not be remembering correctly, but I think spinning the frequency knob while the generator was on could slow it way down to the point of needing a hard reboot. Performance on the tracking generator left much to be desired. The UI was much more friendly for the older crowd who was accustomed to the classic R2600's and whatnot. Ease of use for Autotest trumped classic manual operation for this specific scenario. Run time on battery power was pretty good for the 8800, and pretty bad for the Freedom.

    Ultimately, auto test performance was key and we needed it able to be automated as much as possible for the minimally trained. We went with the 8800sx, which beat the Freedom unit hands down in my testing. Now for the skinny on the WalletFlex. They had all sorts of issues at first. Mine conked out right out of the box, with some sort of hard disk corruption. When I got it back, it had very long startup times, like 10+ minutes long. A firmware update fixed that. Then, it would refuse to autotest mobiles without a specific external attenuator, despite only being 45w with the monitor rated for over a hundred. Firmware update again fixed that. Third thing to happen was much less critical, but still a problem. Performing operations with a flash drive such as saving logs or uploading presets took longer than expected, with no indication of activity. It was easy to pull a seemingly idle flash drive, goofing it up since I only used crummy trade show freebies. Speaking of flash drives, the monitor just would not even see certain ones. Again, my garbage trade show freebies. Phone support even said so, when I could get a hold of them, which was another problem. Testing radios with hokey serials, such as XTS5000's with serial 123ABC456 worked, but would do weird things with the log. The test results would not display correctly, and had to be manually deleted one entry at a time. Not much I could do though, these were legit paying customers with illegit radios.

    Documentation is better for the Aeroflex too, especially if you want to make it do parlor tricks like remote control over the network, or just mirroring it's controls to a PC.

    In short, I expected the product to work out of the box considering the cost, and I was sadly mistaken. If I were to do it again though, I would still get the 8800's, as the Freedom monitor was comically behind in the critical categories of Autotest and align, tracking generator, and return loss. I didn't even bother to test it's OTA capabilities it was so far behind the 8800.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to FuzzyReception For This Useful Post:

    moetorola (Jun 11, 2019)

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 27, 2019
    Posts
    10
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by FuzzyReception View Post
    I tested both, and ultimately recomended the 8800sx for my employer. We were mostly interested in TRBO auto align, and the Freedom unit fell on it's face in that regard. It required many more steps with much more operator involvement, and at the time required the use of the Motorola audio test box. The 8800 was much more i̶d̶i̶o̶t̶ new technician and more importantly, long time employee with poor computer skills proof, and could easily skip tests you didn't want. The Freedom service monitor also had terrible UI lag under certain conditions. This was a year and a half ago so I might not be remembering correctly, but I think spinning the frequency knob while the generator was on could slow it way down to the point of needing a hard reboot. Performance on the tracking generator left much to be desired. The UI was much more friendly for the older crowd who was accustomed to the classic R2600's and whatnot. Ease of use for Autotest trumped classic manual operation for this specific scenario. Run time on battery power was pretty good for the 8800, and pretty bad for the Freedom.

    Ultimately, auto test performance was key and we needed it able to be automated as much as possible for the minimally trained. We went with the 8800sx, which beat the Freedom unit hands down in my testing. Now for the skinny on the WalletFlex. They had all sorts of issues at first. Mine conked out right out of the box, with some sort of hard disk corruption. When I got it back, it had very long startup times, like 10+ minutes long. A firmware update fixed that. Then, it would refuse to autotest mobiles without a specific external attenuator, despite only being 45w with the monitor rated for over a hundred. Firmware update again fixed that. Third thing to happen was much less critical, but still a problem. Performing operations with a flash drive such as saving logs or uploading presets took longer than expected, with no indication of activity. It was easy to pull a seemingly idle flash drive, goofing it up since I only used crummy trade show freebies. Speaking of flash drives, the monitor just would not even see certain ones. Again, my garbage trade show freebies. Phone support even said so, when I could get a hold of them, which was another problem. Testing radios with hokey serials, such as XTS5000's with serial 123ABC456 worked, but would do weird things with the log. The test results would not display correctly, and had to be manually deleted one entry at a time. Not much I could do though, these were legit paying customers with illegit radios.

    Documentation is better for the Aeroflex too, especially if you want to make it do parlor tricks like remote control over the network, or just mirroring it's controls to a PC.

    In short, I expected the product to work out of the box considering the cost, and I was sadly mistaken. If I were to do it again though, I would still get the 8800's, as the Freedom monitor was comically behind in the critical categories of Autotest and align, tracking generator, and return loss. I didn't even bother to test it's OTA capabilities it was so far behind the 8800.
    Thanks very much for the time you took to give some feedback. Pretty much what I've seen so far, and yes the Aeroflex is very picky for dongle size. All their models have been like this as I used to carry a 3550 and these were famous for that. I think we've pretty much decided that the Aeroflex is the better of the two boxes at this point. Yes it's slower but yes alot less gui issues as you've already found also. Tnx again!

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 11, 2012
    Location
    Stinkadeener
    Posts
    967
    Thanks
    791
    Thanked 1,262 Times in 563 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default

    I had a 8800 demo for a while and I HATED the UI... I mean, absolutely despised it. I used it to test and service analog repeaters in the field and *attempted* to mod a MastrIIE from 47 MHz to 6 meters with it, and was unsuccessful on both counts, having to resort to my old R2590 analog monitor. If they had just taken the 3920 GUI and modded it for a touch screen device I would have loved it. I also played with a R8000 in a limited capacity with the auto-tune feature, and agree with everything that was posted above. Get a 3920 for auto-tuning, and something else for field service work.
    "The Girl Scouts found several hungry REACT members at the finish line..."

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 10, 2019
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Posts
    27
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 24 Times in 13 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default

    I am testing both in the shop right now and have so many issues with both. The freedom constantly locks up switching radios, wont communicate with my NX radios, randomly stops communication with my A25 radios, goes batcrap crazy on my dual band APX mobiles (Please connect antenna to: BAND INVALID")

    The 8800SX is slightly better, but flips out and fails my NX radios (500khz off freq reported... i dont think so) and both require a USB hub for my EFJ and KW radios.

    Both are trying to win my business and so far atleast the aeroflex/cobham/viavi/whoevertheyarethisweek folks are making an effort to fix the issues.

    I do like that the freedom boxes test the microphones as well, the viavi boxes do not.

    We are on our 2nd box from both vendors. I am floored that they would send us boxes with issues given we are in the market for three. Seems like we would get the primos!

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Echo4Thirty For This Useful Post:

    FuzzyReception (Jun 14, 2019),motorola_otaku (Jun 13, 2019)

  11. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 09, 2019
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 7 Times in 4 Posts
    Country: United States

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Echo4Thirty View Post
    We are on our 2nd box from both vendors. I am floored that they would send us boxes with issues given we are in the market for three. Seems like we would get the primos!
    You'd think that, wouldn't you? At least you are getting something out of the moneyflex folks. It was more work than it should have been to find, but I got a phone number for support from them. For the Freedom monitor, I only got an email address, and it was for their third party sales rep. I received some really defensive responses. I felt sort of insulted on multiple fronts. Being able to call someone, especially someone technical, is huge. Can you imagine trying to support Motorola's silliness without having the number to call? I don't know about you, but they were on speed dial.

    Also, brand names are strong, it's my opinion that they should not be doing this aeroflex/cobham/viavi thing unless they legally can't continue with the legacy Aeroflex name.