- Joined
- Nov 5, 2012
- Messages
- 701
These sons of bitches getting licenses these days (WITH CERTAIN EXCEPTIONS) think their IT certifications make them experts in the radio field. *sigh*. These are appliance operators.
That's why the average enterprise WLAN is terrible.
Does it have Telnet? Does it have SNMP? Is it a managed scalable solution as a service SAAS? What kind of an endpoint doesn't have SNMP, SSH, or Telnet? Where is the single pain of glass hosted on the private cloud?
They don't even know IT, they buy their wireless APs based on who their switching and routing vendor is, not who has the best RF and antenna design, thermal management, cpu, ram, and software/firmware.
Gotta love those Aironets frequently installed with 2 feet of tiny coax to panel antennas with massive feedline loss at 2.4/5GHz.
When you have decent internal RF design with implicit beamforming on 2.4GHz (where you only have 3 non-overlapping channels) which was optional in 802.11N 2009 (and only Belair, Ruckus, and few others bothered to implement), you don't need so many crappy APs and panel antennas with lossy feedlines to mitigate interference and do efficient channel reuse.
With 5GHz, you can get away with junkier access points closer together since there is more spectrum, but 802.11AC decent throughput is only realized with high quality RF design. Otherwise its just like flaky inconsistent 802.11N 5GHz HT40 on Steroids.
On most APs out there, change a phone or tablet from vertical polarization to horizontal (laying on table) and you loose 6db since the design doesn't account for it. Not to mention all of the unnecessary multipath and reflection on onmi antennas or poorly designed beamforming elements.
/rant
Last edited: